DICHOTOMY BETWEEN POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION
POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION DICHOTOMY
(WOODROW WILSON)
Ø The
study of PA dates back to 19th century, particularly in 1887.
Ø Before
then administration was shadowed into political science
Ø In
his essay titled, “The Study of Public Administration” published in Political
Science Quarterly, WW struck a new concern for PA
Ø WW
created a new dimension which delineated politics from administration
Ø However,
scholars have attributed the emergence of PA as a study to the event of
Industrial Revolution which started in 1807 and was eventually passed into law
by the British Parliament in 1853.
Ø By
then, slaves who worked in farms and companies of British and American
businessmen had their status changed to ‘workers’; they were no more compelled
to work against their wish.
Ø The
slaves who had gained knowledge about their freedom started developing haughty
attitude and recalcitrance towards work
Ø This
affected production and business in US and British companies because not most
of the businessmen could afford the expensive machines which were in limited
supply
Ø There
was then the search for a workable model that could help enhance industrial
production since it was obvious that the slave-driving model had been abolished
by Anti-Slave Trade Act of British Parliament
Ø Woodrow
Wilson, himself being a beneficiary of slave trade business in 1887 initiated a
dichotomy between politics and administration
The
points raised in favor of dichotomy are as follows:
Ø Politics
involves control of the state power while administration involves provision of
basic services
Ø The
task of PA involves and gives room for professionalism while politics does not.
Thus, administrators need to possess technical skills and experience in order to
perform more effectively so they need to be kept aside to specialize and
concentrate
Ø While
politics involves formation of legislations, administration involves
implementation, thus, politicians make the laws which administrators implement
the laws
Ø Dichotomy
encourages neutrality in service. Administrators run the state machinery so
they need to be neutral as much as possible in order to focus in their duty
without biasness.
This
argument led to the formulation of administrative and management theories such
as Scientific Management Theory (Frederick Tailor, 1911) and Administrative Managing
Theory (Henry Fayol, 1914)
By
1900, discontent had grown against WW’s analogy by authors like John Gaus,
Robert Dahl and Herbert Simon who opposed the rationality behind the dichotomy.
Their
argument against dichotomy include:
Ø Practice
of PA is practice of politics
Ø Clear
distinction is not achievable because both politicians and administrators make
up the political structures of government
Ø WW’s
analogy is largely inconsistent as a specific duty cannot be performed by one
side alone without depending on the other.
Ø The
gap is too narrow to be recognized
Ø You
cannot keep elected officials out of politics within the administration
-
Interesting... Learning made easy thank you sir
ReplyDeleteThanks. If you have difficulties in any other, feel free to let me know.
ReplyDeleteThanks.
ReplyDeleteThanks you sir but sir how can we answer questions on scope and nature of public administration?
ReplyDeleteSo cool
ReplyDelete